Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County | |
---|---|
Argued November 4, 1980 Decided March 23, 1981 | |
Full case name | Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County (California, Real Party in Interest) |
Citations | 450 U.S. 464 (more) 101 S. Ct. 1200; 67 L. Ed. 2d 437; 1981 U.S. LEXIS 83; 49 U.S.L.W. 4273 |
Holding | |
The statutory rape law of California did not violate the Equal Protection Clause. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Plurality | Rehnquist, joined by Burger, Stewart, Powell |
Concurrence | Stewart |
Concurrence | Blackmun (in judgment) |
Dissent | Brennan, joined by White, Marshall |
Dissent | Stevens |
Laws applied | |
Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment |
Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County, 450 U.S. 464 (1981), was a United States Supreme Court case over the issue of gender bias in statutory rape laws. The petitioner argued that the statutory rape law discriminated based on gender and was unconstitutional. The court ruled that this differentiation passes intermediate scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause because it serves an important state goal, stating that sexual intercourse entails a higher risk for women than men. Thus, the court found the law justified.[1]