| Part of a series on |
| Atonement in Christianity |
|---|
.JPG) |
Theories
|
|
Ransom (Patristic) |
|
Christus Victor (20th century) |
|
Recapitulation
|
|
Satisfaction (Scholastic / Anselmian) |
|
Penal substitution (Scholastic / Reformed / Arminian) |
|
Governmental
|
|
Moral influence (Mixed) |
|
Moral example (Socinian) |
|
|
|
Types |
|
Limited (Scholastic / Reformed) |
|
Unlimited (Amyraldism / Arminianism / Protestantism) |
|
See also |
| Christian universalism |
 |
| Part of a series on the |
| Catholic Church |
|---|
 |
| Overview |
 Catholic Church portal |
The moral influence or moral example theory of atonement, developed or most notably propagated by Abelard (1079–1142),[1][2][note 1] is an alternative to Anselm's satisfaction theory of atonement.[1] Abelard focused on changing man's perception of God as not offended, harsh, and judgmental, but as loving.[1] According to Abelard, "Jesus died as the demonstration of God's love", a demonstration which can change the hearts and minds of the sinners, turning them back to God.[1][3]
- ^ a b c d Weaver 2001, p. 18.
- ^ Beilby & Eddy 2009, p. 18.
- ^ Beilby & Eddy 2009, p. 19.
Cite error: There are <ref group=note> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=note}} template (see the help page).