Moritz v. Commissioner | |
---|---|
Court | United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit |
Full case name | Charles E. Moritz, Petitioner-appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-appellee |
Decided | November 22, 1972 |
Citation | 469 F.2d 466 (10th Cir. 1972) |
Case history | |
Prior actions | Decision for the Commissioner, 55 T.C. 113 (1970). |
Subsequent actions | Cert. denied, 412 U.S. 906 (1973). |
Court membership | |
Judges sitting | Judges William Judson Holloway Jr., William Edward Doyle, Fred Daugherty[1] |
Charles E. Moritz v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 469 F.2d 466 (1972), was a case before the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in which the Court held that discrimination on the basis of sex constitutes a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution. Charles Moritz had claimed a tax deduction for the cost of a caregiver for his invalid mother and the Internal Revenue Service had denied the deduction. The law specifically allowed such a deduction, but only for women and formerly married men, which Moritz was not.
The United States Tax Court agreed with the IRS's decision to deny the deduction, but on appeal the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned that decision, holding that the tax code conflicted with the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution and extending the caregiver deduction to never-married men.