NLRB v. Kentucky River Community Care, Inc. | |
---|---|
Argued February 21, 2001 Decided May 29, 2001 | |
Full case name | National Labor Relations Board v. Kentucky River Community Care, Inc. |
Citations | 532 U.S. 706 (more) 121 S. Ct. 1861; 149 L. Ed. 2d 939 |
Case history | |
Prior | Ky. River Cmty. Care, Inc. v. NLRB, 193 F.3d 444 (6th Cir. 1999); cert. granted, 530 U.S. 1304 (2000). |
Holding | |
1. Respondent carries the burden of proving the nurses' supervisory status in the representation hearing and unfair labor practice proceeding 2. The Board's test for determining supervisory status was inconsistent with the Act. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Scalia, joined by unanimous (part II); Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Thomas (parts I and III) |
Concur/dissent | Stevens, joined by Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer |
Laws applied | |
National Labor Relations Act of 1935 |
NLRB v. Kentucky River Community Care, Inc., 532 U.S. 706 (2001), is a US labor law case, concerning the scope of labor rights in the United States.[1]