Oberon-2

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages) This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "Oberon-2" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (April 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this message) This article's use of external links may not follow Wikipedia's policies or guidelines. Please improve this article by removing excessive or inappropriate external links, and converting useful links where appropriate into footnote references. (February 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Oberon-2

Paradigms	Imperative, structured, modular, object-oriented
Family	Wirth Oberon
Designed by	Niklaus Wirth Hanspeter Mössenböck
Developer	ETH Zurich
First appeared	1991; 33 years ago (1991)
Typing discipline	Strong, hybrid (static and dynamic)
Scope	Lexical
Platform	Ceres (NS32032), IA-32, x86-64
OS	Windows, Linux, Solaris, macOS
Website	www.ethoberon.ethz.ch
Influenced by
Oberon, Modula-2, Object Oberon
Influenced
Oberon-07, Zonnon, Active Oberon, Component Pascal, Go, Nim

Oberon-2 is an extension of the original Oberon programming language that adds limited reflective programming (reflection) and object-oriented programming facilities, open arrays as pointer base types, read-only field export, and reintroduces the FOR loop from Modula-2.

It was developed in 1991 at ETH Zurich by Niklaus Wirth and Hanspeter Mössenböck, who is now at Institut für Systemsoftware (SSW) of the University of Linz, Austria. Oberon-2 is a superset of Oberon, is fully compatible with it, and was a redesign of Object Oberon.

Oberon-2 inherited limited reflection and single inheritance ("type extension") without the interfaces or mixins from Oberon, but added efficient virtual methods ("type bound procedures"). Method calls were resolved at runtime using C++-style virtual method tables.

Compared to fully object-oriented languages like Smalltalk, in Oberon-2, basic data types and classes are not objects, many operations are not methods, there is no message passing (it can be emulated somewhat by reflection and through message extension, as demonstrated in ETH Oberon), and polymorphism is limited to subclasses of a common class (no duck typing as in Python,^[1] and it's not possible to define interfaces as in Java). Oberon-2 does not support encapsulation at object or class level, but modules can be used for this purpose.

Reflection in Oberon-2 does not use metaobjects, but simply reads from type descriptors compiled into the executable binaries, and exposed in the modules that define the types and/or procedures. If the format of these structures are exposed at the language level (as is the case for ETH Oberon, for example), reflection could be implemented at the library level. It could thus be implemented almost entirely at library level, without changing the language code. Indeed, ETH Oberon makes use of language-level and library-level reflection abilities extensively.

Oberon-2 provides built-in runtime support for garbage collection similar to Java and performs bounds and array index checks, etc., that eliminate the potential stack and array bounds overwriting problems and manual memory management issues inherent in C and C++. Separate compiling using symbol files and namespaces via the module architecture ensure fast rebuilds since only modules with changed interfaces need to be recompiled.

The language Component Pascal^[2] is a refinement (a superset) of Oberon-2.