| Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued February 21, 2024 Decided June 27, 2024 | |
| Full case name | Ohio et al v. Environmental Protection Agency et al |
| Docket no. | 23A349 |
| Citations | 603 U.S. __ (more) |
| Argument | Oral argument |
| Questions presented | |
| (1) Whether the court should stay the Environmental Protection Agency’s federal emission reductions rule, the Good Neighbor Plan; and (2) whether the emissions controls imposed by the rule are reasonable regardless of the number of states subject to the rule. | |
| Holding | |
| The applications for a stay are granted; enforcement of EPA’s rule against the applicants shall be stayed pending the disposition of the applicants’ petition for review in the D. C. Circuit and any petition for writ of certiorari, timely sought | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Gorsuch, joined by Roberts, Alito, Thomas, Kavanaugh |
| Dissent | Barrett, joined by Sotomayor, Kagan, Jackson |
| Laws applied | |
| Clean Air Act | |
Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency, 603 U.S. ___ (2024), is a United States Supreme Court case regarding the Clean Air Act.