Alternative medicine | |
---|---|
Claims | Health effects of dietary supplements, particularly vitamin megadoses. |
Related fields | Naturopathy |
Original proponents | Linus Pauling (coined term) |
MeSH | D009974 |
This article is part of a series on |
Alternative medicine |
---|
Orthomolecular medicine[1][2] is a form of alternative medicine that claims to maintain human health through nutritional supplementation. It is rejected by evidence-based medicine. The concept builds on the idea of an optimal nutritional environment in the body and suggests that diseases reflect deficiencies in this environment. Treatment for disease, according to this view, involves attempts to correct "imbalances or deficiencies based on individual biochemistry" by use of substances such as vitamins, minerals, amino acids, trace elements and fatty acids.[3][4][5] The notions behind orthomolecular medicine are not supported by sound medical evidence, and the therapy is not effective for chronic disease prevention;[6][7] even the validity of calling the orthomolecular approach a form of medicine has been questioned since the 1970s.[8]
The approach is sometimes referred to as megavitamin therapy,[1][2] because its practice evolved out of, and in some cases still uses, doses of vitamins and minerals many times higher than the recommended dietary intake. Orthomolecular practitioners may also incorporate a variety of other styles of treatment into their approaches, including dietary restriction, megadoses of non-vitamin nutrients and mainstream pharmaceutical drugs.[1][9] Proponents argue that non-optimal levels of certain substances can cause health issues beyond simple vitamin deficiency and see balancing these substances as an integral part of health.[10]
American chemist Linus Pauling coined the term "orthomolecular" in the 1960s to mean "the right molecules in the right amounts" (ortho- in Greek implies "correct").[11] Proponents of orthomolecular medicine hold that treatment must be based on each patient's individual biochemistry.[12][13]
The scientific and medical consensus holds that the broad claims of efficacy advanced by advocates of orthomolecular medicine are not adequately tested as drug therapies.[6] It has been described as a form of food faddism and as quackery.[14] There are specific narrow applications where mainstream research has supported benefits for nutrient supplementation,[15][16] and where conventional medicine uses vitamin treatments for some diseases.
Some vitamins in large doses have been linked to increased risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer and death.[17][18][19] The scientific consensus view is that for normal individuals, a balanced diet contains all necessary vitamins and minerals and that routine supplementation is not necessary outside of specific diagnosed deficiencies.[20]
SkinnerP
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).Aaronson2003
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).pauling1968
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).