POM Wonderful LLC v. Coca-Cola Co. | |
---|---|
Argued April 21, 2014 Decided June 12, 2014 | |
Full case name | POM Wonderful LLC v. The Coca-Cola Company |
Docket no. | 12-761 |
Citations | 573 U.S. 102 (more) 134 S. Ct. 2228; 189 L. Ed. 2d 141 |
Argument | Oral argument |
Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
Case history | |
Prior | 679 F.3d 1170 (May 17, 2012), cert. granted, 571 U. S. 1118 (2014) |
Holding | |
Reversed and remanded. Neither the Lanham Act nor the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, in express terms, forbids or limits private Lanham Act claims challenging labels that are regulated by the other Act. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Kennedy, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Ginsburg, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan |
Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Laws applied | |
POM Wonderful LLC v. Coca-Cola Co., 573 U.S. 102 (2014), was a United States Supreme Court case that held that a statutory private right of action under the Lanham Act is not precluded by regulatory provisions of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.[1]