Parliamentarian of the United States Senate | |
---|---|
since 2012 | |
United States Senate | |
Type | Parliamentarian |
Member of | Senate Dais |
Appointer | Senate Majority Leader |
Term length | Serves at the pleasure of the Majority Leader |
Constituting instrument | Standing Rules of the United States Senate |
Formation | 1935 |
First holder | Charles L. Watkins |
Salary | $203,700[1] |
This article is part of a series on the |
United States Senate |
---|
History of the United States Senate |
Members |
|
Politics and procedure |
Places |
The Parliamentarian of the United States Senate is the official advisor to the United States Senate on the interpretation of Standing Rules of the United States Senate and parliamentary procedure. Incumbent parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough has held the office since 2012, appointed by then-Senate majority leader Harry Reid.[2]
As the Presiding officer of the Senate may not be, and usually is not, aware of the parliamentary situation currently facing the Senate, a parliamentary staff sits second from the left on the Senate dais to advise the presiding officer on how to respond to inquiries and motions from senators (including "the Sergeant at Arms will restore order in the gallery"). The role of the parliamentary staff is advisory, and the presiding officer or Senate may overrule the advice of the Parliamentarian. In practice, this is rare; the most recent example of a Vice President (as President of the Senate) overruling the parliamentarian was Nelson Rockefeller in 1975.[3] That ruling was extremely controversial,[4] to such an extent that the leaders of both parties immediately met and agreed that they did not want this precedent to stand, so the next week the Senate altered the rule under consideration via standard procedure.[5] The Senate majority leader may also fire the parliamentarian, as occurred in 2001 during a dispute between parliamentarian Robert Dove and Majority Leader Trent Lott.[6]
Bolton
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).His decisions, especially the furor aroused by Rockefeller's recognition practices, triggered such vehement criticism that it created a hostile mood in the chamber.