Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City | |
---|---|
Argued April 17, 1978 Decided June 26, 1978 | |
Full case name | Penn Central Transportation Company, et al. v. New York City, et al. |
Citations | 438 U.S. 104 (more) |
Case history | |
Prior | Appeal from the Court of Appeals of New York |
Holding | |
Whether a regulatory action that diminishes the value of a claimant's property constitutes a "taking" of that property depends on several factors, including the economic impact of the regulation on the claimant, particularly the extent to which the regulation has interfered with distinct investment-backed expectations, as well as the character of the governmental action. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Brennan, joined by Stewart, White, Marshall, Blackmun, Powell |
Dissent | Rehnquist, joined by Burger, Stevens |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. V |
Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City, 438 U.S. 104 (1978), was a landmark United States Supreme Court decision on compensation for regulatory takings.[1] Penn Central sued New York City after the New York City Landmark Preservation Commission denied its bid to build a large office building on top of Grand Central Terminal. The Supreme Court ruled in the city's favor.