People v. Diaz

People v. Diaz
Seal of the Supreme Court of California
Argued October 5, 2010
Decided January 3, 2011
Full case nameThe People v. Gregory Diaz
Citation(s)51 Cal. 4th 84; 244 P.3d 501; 119 Cal. Rptr. 3d 105; 2011
Case history
Prior historyReview granted, California Court of Appeals decision unpublished
Holding
Affirmed the judgment of the Court of Appeals denying motion to suppress evidence obtained without warrant from Diaz's cell phone upon lawful custodial arrest.
Court membership
Chief JusticeJoyce L. Kennard (Acting)
Associate JusticesKathryn Werdegar, Ming Chin, Marvin R. Baxter, Carol Corrigan, Ronald M. George, Carlos R. Moreno
Case opinions
MajorityChin, joined by Baxter, Corrigan, George
ConcurrenceKennard
Concur/dissentWerdegar, joined by Moreno
Laws applied
U.S. Const. Amend. IV
Overruled by
Riley v. California, 573 US ___ (2014)

People v. Diaz, 51 Cal. 4th 84, 244 P.3d 501, 119 Cal. Rptr. 3d 105 (Cal. January 3, 2011) was a Supreme Court of California case, which held that police are not required to obtain a warrant to search information contained within a cell phone in a lawful arrest.[1] In a sting operation conducted by local police, the defendant, Gregory Diaz, was arrested for the sale of the illicit drug ecstasy and his cellphone, containing incriminating evidence, was seized and searched without a warrant. In trial court proceedings, Diaz motioned to suppress the information obtained from his cellphone, which was denied on the grounds that the search of his cellphone was incident to a lawful arrest. The California Court of Appeal affirmed the court's decision and was later upheld by the California Supreme Court.[2] In 2014, the United States Supreme Court overruled that position in Riley v. California and held that without a warrant, police may not search the digital information on a cellphone that has been seized incident to arrest.[3]

  1. ^ Minkevtich, Hannah (February 23, 2011). "People v. Diaz: Is Your iPhone Constitutionally Protected?". Berkeley Technology Law Journal Bolt. Retrieved March 18, 2012.
  2. ^ Cite error: The named reference SCDecision was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  3. ^ Cite error: The named reference Riley was invoked but never defined (see the help page).