Pimelite

Pimelite
Pimelite from Szklary, Lower Silesia, Poland. Specimen size 2.3 cm (0.9 in)
General
CategoryPhyllosilicates
Formula
(repeating unit)
Ni3Si4O10(OH)2·4H2O[1]
Strunz classification8/H.09-65 (8 ed)
Dana classification71.3.1b.5
Crystal systemHexagonal
Unknown space group
Identification
Formula mass554.5 g/mol[2]
ColorBright green, apple green, yellow-green
Crystal habitFine-grained, also fibrous
CleavageNone
FractureUneven to conchoidal
Mohs scale hardness2.0–2.5
LusterWaxy
StreakWhite
DiaphaneityTranslucent
Specific gravity2.23–2.98
Optical propertiesBiaxial (−)
Can appear isotropic due to fine grain size[3]
Refractive indexNx = 1.592
Ny = 1.615
PleochroismPale green, colourless to light yellow green
SolubilityDecomposed by acids[3]
Other characteristicsNeither radioactive[1] nor fluorescent[4]
Expands to 17.35 A using glycol[4]
Nonmagnetic[2]
References[1][2][3][4]

Pimelite was discredited as a mineral species by the International Mineralogical Association (IMA) in 2006, in an article which suggests that "pimelite" specimens are probably willemseite (which is approved), or kerolite (which is also discredited). This was a mass discreditation, and not based on any re-examination of the type material (assuming any exists).[5] Nevertheless, a considerable number of papers have been written, verifying that pimelite is a nickel-dominant smectite.[4][6][7][8][9] It is always possible to redefine a mineral wrongly discredited.[5]

The mineral was erroneously assumed to be a nickel-rich talc in a paper published in the American Mineralogist in 1979,[10] but it had already been determined to be a smectite as early as 1938, and this was confirmed in another article in the American Mineralogist in 1966.[8] Both nickel-bearing talc and nickel dominant smectite occur at the type locality, Szklary, Ząbkowice Śląskie County, Lower Silesia, Poland.[4]

  1. ^ a b c Cite error: The named reference Webmin was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  2. ^ a b c http://www.wolframalpha.com/entities/minerals/pimelite [dead link]
  3. ^ a b c Gaines et al (1997) Dana's New Mineralogy Eighth Edition. Wiley
  4. ^ a b c d e Mindat.org
  5. ^ a b Burke (2007) Canadian Mineralogist: 44-6: 1557
  6. ^ Economic Geology (1949) 44:13
  7. ^ Economic Geology (2004) 99:1197
  8. ^ a b Faust (1966) American Mineralogist 51:279
  9. ^ Manceau and Calas (1985) American Mineralogist 70: 549
  10. ^ Brindley, Bish and Wan (1979) American Mineralogist 64:615