| Planned Parenthood Arizona, et al. v. Mayes | |
|---|---|
| Court | Arizona Supreme Court |
| Full case name | Planned Parenthood Arizona, Inc., Successor-in-interest to Planned Parenthood Center of Tucson, Inc., Laura Conover, Pima County Attorney, appellants, v. Kristin K. Mayes, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Appelee, and Eric Hazelbrigg, M.D., as guardian Ad Litem of unborn child Jane Doe and all other unborn infants similarly situated; Dennis McGrane, Yavapai County Attorney, Intervenors |
| Decided | April 9, 2024 |
| Verdict | 4-2 |
| Citation | CV-23-0005-PR |
| Case history | |
| Appealed from | Superior Court of Pima County, No. C127867 |
| Appealed to | Court of Appeals, Division 2, 254 Ariz. 401 (App. 2022) |
| Argument | Oral argument |
| Court membership | |
| Chief judge | Robert M. Brutinel |
| Associate judges | |
| Case opinions | |
| Decision by | Lopez, joined by Bolick, King, Beene |
| Dissent | Timmer, joined by Brutinel |
| Montgomery took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
| Laws applied | |
| Arizona Revised Statutes § 13-3603, 36-2322 | |
Superseded by | |
| Arizona HB 2677 (in part) 2024 Arizona Proposition 139 (in whole) | |
Planned Parenthood Arizona, et al. v. Kris Mayes was an Arizona Supreme Court case in which the court upheld an 1864 law criminalizing abortions except to save the life of the mother.[1] Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes did not enforce the law when it was in effect.[2] The law was repealed on May 2, 2024, and the repeal took effect on September 14, 2024.[3] 2024 Arizona Proposition 139 passed on November 5, 2024, establishing a right to abortion in the Constitution of Arizona.