Preston v. Ferrer | |
---|---|
Argued January 14, 2008 Decided February 20, 2008 | |
Full case name | Arnold M. Preston, Petitioner v. Alex E. Ferrer |
Docket no. | 06-1463 |
Citations | 552 U.S. 346 (more) 128 S. Ct. 978; 169 L. Ed. 2d 917 |
Case history | |
Prior | Ferrer v. Preston, 145 Cal.App.4th 440, 51 Cal.Rptr.3d 628 (App. 2d Dist. 2006) |
Holding | |
When all parties to a contract agree to arbitrate their disputes, this also covers disputes which state law requires be referred to an administrative agency. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Ginsburg, joined by Roberts, Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Breyer, Alito |
Dissent | Thomas |
Laws applied | |
Federal Arbitration Act |
Preston v. Ferrer, 552 U.S. 346 (2008), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held, 8–1, that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) overrules state laws declaring that certain disputes must be resolved by a state administrative agency.[1]