This article contains too many or overly lengthy quotations. (January 2009) |
Rizzo v. Goode | |
---|---|
Argued November 11, 1975 Decided January 21, 1976 | |
Full case name | Rizzo, Mayor of Philadelphia, et al. v. Goode, et al. |
Citations | 423 U.S. 362 (more) 96 S. Ct. 598; 46 L. Ed. 2d 561; 1976 U.S. LEXIS 42 |
Argument | Oral argument |
Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Rehnquist, joined by Burger, Stewart, White, Powell |
Dissent | Blackmun, joined by Brennan, Marshall |
Stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. |
Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362 (1976), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a prophylactic injunction against non-culpable state executive officials was an overbroad interference by the Federal Courts in the state executive branches. In doing so, the court created a limit on the federal injunctive power in matters of state agency internal affairs.[1]