| Rodriguez v. FDIC | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued December 3, 2019 Decided February 25, 2020 | |
| Full case name | Rodriguez, as chapter 7 trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of United Western Bancorp, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as receiver for United Western Bank |
| Docket no. | 18-1269 |
| Citations | 589 U.S. (more) |
| Argument | Oral argument |
| Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
| Case history | |
| Prior | 473 F.2d 262 |
| Holding | |
| 473 F.2d 262 (The Bob Richards Rule) is not a legitimate exercise of federal common lawmaking, 914 F.3d 1262 vacated and remanded | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Gorsuch, joined by a unanimous court |
Rodriguez v. FDIC was a United States Supreme Court case (589 U.S. ____ (2020)) in which the court held that the Bob Richards rule was not appropriately crafted and federal judges should not apply it when resolving disputes about tax allocations to members of an affiliated group filing a consolidated return.[1][2]
- ^ Rodriguez v. FDIC, 589 18-1269 (U.S. 25 February 2020).
- ^ Jones, Roger J. (February 26, 2020). "Supreme Court Tackles Tax-Related Cases". The National Law Review. X (57). Retrieved January 11, 2022.