Political and legal dispute between Israel and the Palestinians
The Sheikh Jarrah controversy, which has been described as a "property/real estate dispute" by the Israeli government and its supporters,[1] and as an "expulsion", "displacement" or "ethnic cleansing" event and a matter of international law by Palestinians and their supporters,[2][3] is a long-running legal and political dispute between Palestinians and Israelis over the ownership of certain properties and housing units in Sheikh Jarrah, East Jerusalem. The evictions are considered a contributory cause of the 2021 Israel–Palestine crisis.[4][5]
It has been described as a microcosm of the Israeli–Palestinian disputes over land since 1948,[6][7] with academic Kristen Alff noting "To describe dispossessions in Sheikh Jarrah as a "real estate" quarrel conceals the true history of land ownership in the regions – which is complicated, disputed and rarely decided in favor of Palestinians."[8] In East Jerusalem, Israel's laws allow Jews to file claims over property held prior to 1948, but reject Palestinian claims over property that they owned prior to 1948 in Israel proper.[9][10][11] According to Middle East Eye, the dispute is part of the Israeli government's Holy Basin settlement strategy.[12]Aryeh King, a deputy mayor of Jerusalem and one of the founders of the Ma'ale HaZeitim settler compound, told The New York Times that the eviction of Palestinian families was "of course" part of a municipal strategy to create "layers of Jews" throughout East Jerusalem.[13] Many Palestinian families in East Jerusalem have been affected by "forced relocation processes or been involved in lengthy legal procedures to revoke an eviction order".[14]
The property in Sheikh Jarrah in dispute includes the adjacent Shimon HaTzadik/Karm Al-Ja’ouni and Um Haroun (former Nahalat Shimon) compounds to the East and West respectively of the Nablus Road. In the former, the Palestinian residents of Sheikh Jarrah were refugees who received plots of land in a UNRWA lottery, relinquishing in return their refugee documents and accompanying rights. They have no right under Israeli law to repossess their pre-1948 homes in Haifa, Sarafand and Jaffa.[15][16] The Palestinian view is that given Sheikh Jarrah's location beyond the Green Line or Israel proper, Israeli courts have no jurisdiction over land disputes in what is occupied territory according to international law, and that the displacement of people in occupied territory is a war crime under the Rome Statute.[17] The United Nations Human Rights Office has said that as Sheikh Jarrah is in East Jerusalem, which is considered occupied territory, international humanitarian law prohibits the confiscation of private property and evictions of Palestinian families could constitute war crimes.[18]
^Hurst, Luke (20 May 2021). "Sheikh Jarrah: Small neighbourhood making big impact in Gaza conflict". Euronews. Archived from the original on 21 May 2021. Retrieved 28 May 2021. What is happening in Sheikh Jarrah has been characterised by the settlers and their supporters as a mere property dispute. Lucy Garbett, 'I live in Sheikh Jarrah. For Palestinians, this is not a ‘real estate dispute’Archived 25 May 2021 at the Wayback MachineThe Guardian, 17 May 2021: "There have been many attempts to portray the cases of dispossession in Jerusalem, and Sheikh Jarrah specifically, as isolated, individual incidents, painting them as "real estate disputes" that drag on for years in court. But for Palestinians, Sheikh Jarrah is simply a microcosm of life in Jerusalem. It symbolises the continuing ethnic cleansing of our land and homes." Haynes Brown, 'The latest Israel-Palestine crisis isn't a 'real estate dispute'. It's ethnic cleansing', Archived 2 June 2021 at the Wayback MachineMSNBC, 11 May 2021: "Regrettably, the PA" — the Palestinian Authority — "and Palestinian terror groups are presenting a real-estate dispute between private parties, as a nationalistic cause, in order to incite violence in Jerusalem," the ministry said in a statement Saturday, two days after anger in the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood of east Jerusalem began to boil over. Calling the catalyst of all this a 'real estate dispute' is a particularly noxious way to diminish what's actually occurring: Nahalat Shimon, a U.S.-based settler organization, is trying to have Palestinians who have lived in the neighborhood since 1956 evicted." Patrick Kingsley,'Israeli Court Delays Expulsion of Palestinian Families in East Jerusalem,'Archived 9 May 2021 at the Wayback MachineThe New York Times, 9 May 2021
^"What has caused Jerusalem's worst violence in years?". The Guardian. 11 May 2021. Archived from the original on 12 May 2021. Retrieved 15 May 2021. Under Israeli law, Jews who can prove pre-1948 title can claim back their Jerusalem properties. No similar law exists for Palestinians who lost homes in West Jerusalem.
^Meir Margalit (26 July 2018). "9. Silent Forced Migrations in Twenty-First-Century Jerusalem". In Tabea Linhard; Timothy H. Parsons (eds.). Mapping Migration, Identity, and Space. Springer International Publishing. p. 221-. ISBN978-3-319-77955-3. Archived from the original on 25 May 2021. Retrieved 25 May 2021.