Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp.

This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp." – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (January 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued February 8–9, 1940 Decided March 25, 1940
Full case name	Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp.
Citations	309 U.S. 390 (more) 60 S. Ct. 681; 84 L. Ed. 825
Holding
In the case of an unauthorized adaptation, courts may elect to award only a portion of an infringer's profits to the plaintiff. The proportion that the defendant is entitled to keep is in proportion to the amount of original creative work went into the adaptation, and the court may be assisted in determining that by expert witness testimony.
Court membership
Chief Justice Charles E. Hughes Associate Justices James C. McReynolds · Harlan F. Stone Owen Roberts · Hugo Black Stanley F. Reed · Felix Frankfurter William O. Douglas · Frank Murphy
Case opinion
Majority	Hughes, joined by unanimous
McReynolds took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp., 309 U.S. 390 (1940), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held, in the case of an unauthorized adaptation, courts may elect to award only a portion of an infringer's profits to the plaintiff. The proportion that the defendant is entitled to keep is in proportion to the amount of original creative work that went into the adaptation, and the court may be assisted in determining that by expert witness testimony. The Court found that awarding more to the plaintiff "would be to inflict an unauthorized penalty."^[1]

The case involved Metro-Goldwyn using material from the 1930 play Dishonored Lady by Edward Sheldon and Margaret Ayer Barnes for the 1932 film Letty Lynton. It was brought before various courts^[2][3] before ending up with the Supreme Court, which awarded one fifth of the profits.^[4]