Sossamon v. Texas | |
---|---|
Argued 2 November, 2010 Decided 20 April, 2011 | |
Full case name | Harvey Leroy Sossamon, III, petitioner v. Texas et al. |
Docket no. | 08-1438 |
Citations | 563 U.S. 277 (more) |
Argument | Oral argument |
Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
Holding | |
State officials cannot be sued in their official capacity for monetary damages under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. Affirmed decision of the Fifth Circuit. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Thomas, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Alito |
Dissent | Sotomayor, joined by Breyer |
Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. |
Sossamon v. Texas, 563 U.S. 277 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case on the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment, the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), and sovereign immunity. The majority decision, written by Justice Clarence Thomas, held that the petitioner could not sue Texas state officials in their official capacity for damages under the RLUIPA, affirming a lower court ruling. The majority reasoned that the officials could not be sued under the RLUIPA because it was passed under the United States Congress’s Spending Power, not its Fourteenth Amendment Power.[1][2]