Speiser v. Randall | |
---|---|
Argued April 8–9, 1958 Decided June 30, 1958 | |
Full case name | Lawrence Speiser v. Randall, Assessor of Contra Costa County, California |
Citations | 357 U.S. 513 (more) 78 S. Ct. 1332; 2 L. Ed. 2d 1460; 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1803 |
Holding | |
Enforcement of the provision by procedures placing the burdens of proof and persuasion on the taxpayers and denying them freedom of speech, violated the procedural safeguards required by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Brennan, joined by Black, Frankfurter, Douglas, Harlan, Whittaker |
Concurrence | Black, joined by Douglas |
Concurrence | Douglas, joined by Black |
Concurrence | Burton (in judgment) |
Dissent | Clark |
Warren took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. |
Speiser v. Randall, 357 U.S. 513 (1958), was a U.S. Supreme Court case addressing the State of California's refusal to grant to ACLU lawyer Lawrence Speiser, a veteran of World War II, a tax exemption because that person refused to sign a loyalty oath as required by a California law enacted in 1954. The court reversed a lower court ruling that the loyalty oath provision did not violate the appellants' First Amendment rights.