State secrets privilege

The state secrets privilege is an evidentiary rule created by United States legal precedent. Application of the privilege results in exclusion of evidence from a legal case based solely on affidavits submitted by the government stating that court proceedings might disclose sensitive information which might endanger national security.[1][2] United States v. Reynolds,[3] which involved alleged military secrets, was the first case that saw formal recognition of the privilege.

Following a claim of "state secrets privilege", the court rarely conducts an in camera examination of the evidence to evaluate whether there is sufficient cause to support the use of this doctrine. This results in court rulings in which even the judge has not verified the veracity of the assertion. The privileged material is completely removed from the litigation, and the court must determine how the unavailability of the privileged information affects the case.[4]

  1. ^ Cite error: The named reference Executive Misconduct was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  2. ^ Cite error: The named reference Julie Hilden was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  3. ^ United States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S., paragraph 8 (1953) ("The privilege against revealing military secrets, a privilege which is well established in the law of evidence").
    Preview warning: Page using Template:Cite court with unknown parameter "1 = https://caselaw.findlaw.c..."
  4. ^ Cite error: The named reference El-Masri Rendition Case was invoked but never defined (see the help page).