Steagald v. United States | |
---|---|
Argued January 14, 1981 Decided April 21, 1981 | |
Full case name | Gary Steagald v. United States |
Citations | 451 U.S. 204 (more) 101 S. Ct. 1642; 68 L. Ed. 2d 38 |
Case history | |
Prior | 606 F.2d 540, 615 F.2d 642 (affirming district court's denial of motion to suppress and upholding convictions) |
Holding | |
An arrest warrant is not sufficient under the Fourth Amendment to search the home of a third party unless exigent circumstances are present. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Marshall, joined by Brennan, Stewart, Blackmun, Powell, Stevens |
Concurrence | Burger |
Dissent | Rehnquist, joined by White |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. IV 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846 |
Steagald v. United States, 451 U.S. 204 (1981), is a United States Supreme Court case which held that, based on the Fourth Amendment, a police officer may not conduct a warrantless search of a third party's home in an attempt to apprehend the subject of an arrest warrant, absent consent or exigent circumstances.[1]