Sykes v. United States | |
---|---|
Argued January 12, 2011 Decided June 9, 2011 | |
Full case name | Sykes v. United States |
Docket no. | 09-11311 |
Citations | 564 U.S. 1 (more) 131 S. Ct. 2267; 180 L. Ed. 2d 60 |
Argument | Oral argument |
Case history | |
Prior | Sentence enhancement affirmed, 598 F.3d 334 (7th Cir. 2010); cert. granted, 561 U.S. 1058 (2010). |
Holding | |
Felony vehicle flight, as proscribed by Indiana law, is a violent felony for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Kennedy, joined by Roberts, Breyer, Alito, and Sotomayor |
Concurrence | Thomas (in judgment) |
Dissent | Scalia |
Dissent | Kagan, joined by Ginsburg |
Overruled by | |
Johnson v. United States (2015) |
Sykes v. United States, 564 U.S. 1 (2011), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that felony vehicle flight, as proscribed by Indiana law, is a violent felony for purposes of the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA).[1] Writing for the majority, Justice Kennedy wrote that vehicle flight requires officers to give chase, resulting in more injuries on average than burglary.[2] Dissenting, Justice Scalia criticized the majority for producing an ad hoc judgment based on vague legislation, suggesting they should declare the residual clause of the law unconstitutionally vague.[3] The court would follow that advice several years later in Johnson v. United States and declare the residual clause unconstitutionally vague.