Talk:1920 Xalapa earthquake/Archive 1

Archive 1

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1920 Xalapa earthquake/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Bdonjc (talk · contribs) 06:04, 29 October 2022 (UTC)


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Overall, this is a well-written and well-covered article. There were a few spelling and grammatical errors, but I fixed them. Bdonjctalk 04:57, 30 October 2022 (UTC)