Talk:A Simple Lie

A Simple Lie has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 2, 2021. (Reviewed version).

A fact from A Simple Lie appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 April 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that the storyline of Holby City's two-part episode "A Simple Lie" was compared to the Charlie Gard case? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2019/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/A Simple Lie.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Episode coverage / Holby Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Holby task force (assessed as Low-importance). Women This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

This review is transcluded from Talk:A Simple Lie/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 00:46, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:46, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Don't use small font in the infobox per WP:SMALLFONT. Done
• Lead summarizes the entire article and is in great shape.

• Add a comma after "death threats".
• "talks sense Frieda" → "talks sense to Frieda" Done
• "check the hospital security" → "check the hospital for security" Done
• "person taking" → "person from taking" Done
• Get each part of the summary to 400 words each (first is at 411 and second at 417). Done

• "Steele told a Victoria" → "Steele told Victoria" Done
• "appear the show" → "appear on the show" Done

• Add commas after "However" and "the following days". Done
• "described as the move" → "described the move" Done

• This section looks good.

• References are archived.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·