Talk:Abbotsford Bridge

Abbotsford Bridge has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 16, 2013. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: New South Wales / Transport Low‑importance Abbotsford Bridge is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Australian Roads: New South Wales Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Australian Roads, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads and highways in Australian states and territories. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Australian RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Australian RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Australian RoadsAustralia road transport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Topics: /  New South Wales This article may or may not contain a map. Please check, then add "needs-map=" to this template accordingly. This article needs a KML file. If it already has one, purge this page, or add |needs-kml=no to the WikiProject Australian Roads banner.

A fact from Abbotsford Bridge appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 September 2013, and was viewed approximately 2,150 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that Abbotsford Bridge (pictured) was the last lift span bridge to be constructed over the Murray River? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Abbotsford Bridge.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Abbotsford Bridge/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Fredddie (talk · contribs) 22:41, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will review the article shortly. –Fredddie™ 22:41, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The lead seems a little short. There is a long history section yet there is only one sentence of history in the lead.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Overall pretty good, but I think the lead needs to reflect the length of the history section. –Fredddie™ 01:23, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - Has been expanded, if you think it requires further expansion let me know (and some pointers of what needs more focus) -- Nbound (talk) 04:38, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's more like it. Passing now. –Fredddie™ 04:43, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]