This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
for the Commodore 64 in April 1987 - add "released" before "in April 1987
The game was released for 8-bit consoles as well as more advanced 16-bit consoles - do not really think "more advanced" is necessary.
More gameplay information need to be mentioned in the lead
You should split the first paragraph and The game has two endings depending on the side chosen. If playing as NATO, the main objective is to stall Soviet forces long enough until American reinforcements arrive, or if playing as the Warsaw Pact, the objective is to destroy all NATO forces and then create a "setting" section.
a variety of different types of unit - Rephrase it to "a variety of units"
however armoured units will be able to withstand more damage than regular units - "will be able" should be changed to "are able"
There are two maps in the game - Rephrase it to "The game displays two maps on screen".
(despite not having any differentiation on the map) - bracket shouldn't be used. I do not really see the importance of mentioning this actually.
"best looking" wargames he had ever seen - Should be "he had even seen at that time"
@AdrianGamer: thanks for the review! I've attempted top address everything. I removed the "despite not having any differentiation on the map" sentence as it was a little redundant. I've also split some of the gameplay into a new settings section as suggested, I hope I done this right? Please let me know if you have any more concerns or if I messed anything up. Thanks again for the review. JAGUAR21:30, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]