Talk:Bethany School, Goudhurst

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Kent Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Kent tasks: edit history watch purge Here are some Kent related tasks you can do: Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category. Edit the Top and High importance articles. Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council NPOV: K College Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion. Schools Low‑importance This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Reasoning for assessment: Needs some reorg and more references. Pictures wouldn't hurt Adam McCormick 03:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Raker....Either talk about this or I will revert this every hour of every day if I have to. Mark my words.

Your edit violates Wikipedia's NPOV policy - all articles must be written from a neutral point of view. You cannot claim that the school has a bad reputation for games or that this is attributable to the head of games without citing a reliable source. (If this view is indeed held by a majority of parents and pupils then this should not be a problem.) Please familiarise yourself with the NPOV tutorial. Raker 15:29, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Did you go to the school? No you didnt...so what the hell would you know.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.9.67.185 (talk • contribs)

Now now Mr Anonymous, calm down. Wikipedia needs to make sure that all content can be verified. If you can provide a decent source for your material, by all means add it, but taking your word for it is simply not good enough. Even if you alone feel that your school (as you imply) is bad at games, it does not mean that you can add this material - Wikipedia is not the place to make political/emotive/etc. statements. This is not because you are not trusted - it's because everyone else just wants to make sure that the article is accurate. Engaging in such an edit war will resulting in blocking (see The Revert Rule) - and it is something that you would want to avoid. -- Chris Lester ^talk 17:18, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]