Talk:California State Route 11

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the California State Route 11 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days

	California State Route 11 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result April 30, 2016 Good article nominee Listed March 11, 2024 Good article reassessment Kept
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

U.S. Roads: State highways / California Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Topics  U.S. state highways   Locations  California   This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it. This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists. This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This review is transcluded from Talk:California State Route 11/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 17:55, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Happy to review. Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 17:55, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nice article. Here are my comments:

• Lead

• "plan" looks a bit too repeated in the first few lines.

• Done. --Rschen7754 06:14, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Don't say currently, say something like as of 2016.

• Done. --Rschen7754 06:14, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I think it should be clear from the first line itself that the route is under construction.

• Done. --Rschen7754 06:14, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Route description

• Maybe History should precede this section? That's the order I have seen in similar articles.

• I would say that 4 out of 5 actually have the History second, though both are valid per WP:USRD/STDS. --Rschen7754 05:57, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• You should know better about this. Do as you think best. Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 12:06, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• State Route 11 (SR 11) is a state route in San Diego County Please mention this part as well when you begin with the main article.

• In such a short article, I don't think this is necessary; it's in the lead, and in the Major intersections section. --Rschen7754 06:14, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• You have a point there. Let it be. Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 12:06, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Reword currently as suggested above.

• Done. --Rschen7754 06:14, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• History:

• The entire road could be complete by 2017 You mean "is expected to be complete by"? I think this fact is important enough to be mentioned in the lead.

• Done. --Rschen7754 04:08, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Are all points in the table sourced?

• • Added references for the two that weren't. --Rschen7754 04:08, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That should be it. I will return this weekend. I would be happy to promote this once the above points are addressed. Cheers, Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 12:06, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sainsf: all done. --Rschen7754 04:08, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Rschen7754. I see no more issues with the article, really good work. This is promoted. Cheers! Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 03:56, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]