Talk:Chowk.com

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Pakistan Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Websites: Computing Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: No consensus, 12 December 2019, see discussion. Keep, 12 December 2019, see discussion. keep, 17 August 2017 (UTC), see discussion.

This article was nominated for deletion on 30 August 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article was nominated for deletion on 30 May 2005. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article has been kept following this VFD debate Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:59, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I placed a pov tag on this article. I have been studying chowk.com for some time and it most certainly does NOT present a balanced outlook. It is owned and operated by 2 muslims and the majority of it's contributors are muslims. There is a significant amount of anti-Hindu bias and bile in many of their articles (big surprise). Implicitly describing this website as an "intellectual's haven" is as absurd as referring to Islamic terrorists as "Freedom Fighters". Furthermore, there is very little in the way of intelligent debate in any of their threads. Most of it is blubbering nonsense, dangerous terrorist propaganda and hate-speech against Hindus disguised as scholarship. Whenever a Hindu expresses a dissenting point of view, (s)he is immediately barred from the forum. Ironic that westerners generally show more tolerance for Hindus than these people. You wouldn't characterze a Palestinian Islamist and anti-Israel/anti-semetic website in such a blatantly favorable way, would you? Then why this much latitude to South Asian muslims and their virulent Hindu-Bashing? How is that different from their antisemitism? What are you afraid of, bombs? Call a spade a spade, people. We're supposed to be about the facts, not bleeding-heart Liberal socialist propaganda! User:Subhash Bose

I disagree I know many Muslims who would say the exact opposite!..this article fulfills the basics of an article we can just put a mention that it has been criticized by right wing Hindus and Muslims. --Zak 20:00, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Until somebody does, this NPOV tag needs to stay. The edit needs to be done by a NEUTRAL THIRD PARTY. That means neither you nor me. I have put in a preliminary addendum, but added a "cleanup required" tag for the sake of fairness. Now, show me one article on the website that can be construed as anti-muslim. The anti-Hindu articles are a dime a dozen. Again, I maintain. If wikipedia calls a racist a racist, an anti-semite an anti-semite, then an anti-hindu should be referred to as such, as should an islamophobe. --User:Subhash Bose0612,20 May 2006 CST