This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
The last time I attempted to write this article, I wasn't sure of the correct way to do so and made it sound just like an ad. I understand the importance of providing a neutral entry and am open to making any changes recommended.
Thank you for your consideration.
As reviewing administrator, I think that possibly they might be notable, so I am going to remove the speedy tag. I consider that Time article to be PR, and they should be ashamed of themselves. (I see no evidence that it was a cover story , though--what issue was it the cover story in?) The articles in Google News betray their origins by using the same wording. The one in USA Today [1] carries the author's honest disclaimer "(sponsored by the Davidson Institute for Talent Development, an organization based in Reno I consult for)" The ones in G Scholar are mostly authored or sponsored by the Institute. & ditto in G Books. Wikipedia has it's own standards. If anyone wants, they can send this to AfD, and we'll see what other people think. DGG ( talk ) 02:15, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I will make a few updates today to try to improve this entry. I will keep my eyes on this page for any suggestions or questions. Thank you again! Mdlugosz (talk) 19:54, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]