This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the E (Ecco2K album) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2 - Verifiable with no original research (I like doing this first)
All paragraphs and claims reasonably could be challenged are cited, which is good. Fantano source is correctly cited for a video in SFNs with timestamps (I always like seeing that); all the other citations are consistently formatted. I see no evidence of copyvio. As for that spot check:
1a: Yup, they say that.
1b, 2c, 6b, 7a: Oops, your refs are out of order in that footnote. But yes, all of these check out with the background info.
1e and 2e: Both check out.
4d: Quote checks out.
4h: Ditto.
4o: Checks out, but this quote is completely unnecessarily; you can paraphrase it.
15a, 15b, 15c: Same deal here, emphasize paraphrasing when translating. If absolutely necessary to quote, give the original statement as an EFN. Do this with the German and Swedish sources plz
Near the beginning of Composition, you have Nadine Smith and a writer from Dazed described it as contemporary pop, with Smith adding that. This is phrased weirdly, and technically we can't say the Dazed bit was written by one author. I would make the sentence something like Dazed and Pitchfork writer Nadine Smith described it as contemporary pop, with the latter adding that
As I reitterated in the source review, paraphrase! There are a lot of quotes here that can be paraphrased, and it makes sentences (esp. in Composition) difficult to read.
Periods go inside the quotation mark if they end a full sentence; so Sobolik's quote at the beginning of Critical reception needs it, though I feel there's more examples i've missed.
Wasn't able to find any other grammar mistakes or glaring MoS violations.
3 - Broad in its coverage - For a surprise album by a mysterious artist, yeah, this covers all the beats. It seems like everything critics talked about in relation to the album was brought up here, and it's certainly lengthier than many a music GA.
4 - Neutral - The reception is uniformly positive, are there any criticisms from notable critics? If not, understandable; a lot of music appears to not really have reliable source criticism, but important to ask.
6 - Images - There's pretty limited amounts of imagery we can have, as we don't h÷ave pictures of all the artists together or something like that. The album art is correct licensed (yay simple geometry) and has good alt-text. I can't think of any other images that could be added here.
In summary: @Skyshifter: There's a lot of overquoting, that you can resolve by paraphrasing a lot more stuff. Everything else is pretty minor, and I don't see any issues that'd take too long to fix. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 15:13, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.