Talk:Ebola

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ebola article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 30 days

Wikipedia is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image.

Ebola was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 7, 2004	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
August 4, 2006	Good article nominee	Not listed
News items involving this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on May 30, 2010, and August 5, 2012.
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 27, 2020, and June 27, 2022.
Current status: Former good article nominee

Africa Top‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Translation High‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Translation task force (assessed as High-importance).

Viruses Top‑importance

	Viruses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:

Noam Cohen (26 October 2014). "Wikipedia Is Emerging as Trusted Internet Source for Information on Ebola". The New York Times. But amid the fear mongering are several influential sites that are sticking to the facts about Ebola. Millions have come to rely on these sites, including those run by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the World Health Organization and Wikipedia.
Jessi Turnure (3 October 2014). "Study: Most Wikipedia articles about medical conditions contain errors". KAIT. I Google Ebola and the second one is Wikipedia," he said. "That's the first one people click on because they think, 'Well, it's the easiest and maybe it's the best.'" But Dr. Speights said that's wrong. He noticed errors early on in the Wikipedia article on Ebola. [...] "They [c]ited the New York Times Magazine. We don't do that.
Dewey, Caitlin (November 5, 2015). "The most fascinating Wikipedia articles you haven't read". Washington Post. Earlier this year when the Ebola epidemic was on the rise, a group of volunteers, a few of them medical professionals, came together with the goal of making Wikipedia a trustworthy resource about Ebola.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Ebola.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

On 30 May 2010, Ebola was linked from Slashdot, a high-traffic website. (Traffic)

All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2014, when it received 18,585,050 views.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 14 times. The weeks in which this happened: