Talk:Ethical non-naturalism

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy: Ethics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Ethics

This thing is so bad I'm thinking of erasing the entire thing and starting from scratch. Also, the article should be moved to Ethical intuitionism, since that's the more standard term for this view. KSchutte 2 July 2005 21:57 (UTC)

I agree. This article is in desperate need of attention. Unfortunately, since I know very little of the topic, I don't feel up to the job of revising or rewriting it. --DrDeke 01:54, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The whole thing is a complete article torn from here: http://www.theezine.net/e/ethical-non-naturalism.html. I'll attempt to have a look at it, though it's going to take some research - unless it's genuinely felt it would be better to scrap it?? C i d 7 October 2005 16:27 (UTC)

On reflection, this seems to be a messed-up explanation of moral absolutism - I would suggest that this be deleted, and a reference to ethical non-naturalism be put into that article. Not for me to decide though - if it's decided instead that this should be cleared up I'd be happy for someone to put it on my desk, and I'll have a go at it. C i d 7 October 2005 16:36 (UTC)

I cleaned up the tone deleting most instances of very informal language suited for a friendly lecture. Now somebody clean up the content 'cause I have no freaking idea what he is talking about. Renata3 22:45, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]