Talk:Executive education

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Education This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

MrOllie - thank you for fixing the CNN link. however, that article was written in 2005 and the information is out-of-date. the wall street journal published an article earlier this year (“making the case for executive education” - http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123395821293458237.html) and might be a useful reference for the next revision. regarding the external links - the financial times executive education website is an excellent source of information. their newspaper is one of the most prestigious in the world and this report was just published on may 11, 2009. business week is good too but their last update on executive education came out in 2007 and the new survey is not due until later this year. the list of upcoming open enrollment executive education programs is another unique resource. the financial times profiles the executive education schools but does not provide this level of detail for the actual courses offered. look forward to your feedbackExecEdStudent (talk) 03:14, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On the CNN ref, just because a reference is a few years old does not mean we remove it. On reflection I agree that the link to the financial times can stay. I still don't see why the calendar site should be linked - it's just a listing of events and doesn't provide any real information or detail about the article topic. - MrOllie (talk) 14:05, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a source link for the estimated market size by Business Week? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nmvu (talk • contribs) 01:24, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]