This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Square Enix, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Square Enix-related merchandise and video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Square EnixWikipedia:WikiProject Square EnixTemplate:WikiProject Square EnixSquare Enix articles
Just a personal preference but I would re-arrange the openeing sentence "Final Symphony was a symphonic concert first held in Wuppertal, Germany on May 11, 2013 at the Historische Stadthalle Wuppertal" so it reads Final Symphony was a symphonic concert first held at the Historische Stadthalle Wuppertal in Wuppertal, Germany on May 11, 2013, but it reads fine as it is
"It was divided into three acts: a symphonic poem for VI, a piano concerto for X, and a symphony for VII" - are these in order?
"with consultation by Final Fantasy composer Nobuo Uematsu" - from?
Should there be a reception section under the Album section? If so, nothing on what critics thought of it was mentioned in the lead
Some WP:OVERLINK in the Performances section, I would recommend cutting the countries' names as they were already linked in the lead
Did the rephrase; as to the others: Yes, that's the order; changed to from; there is reception but since the album section is only 2 paragraphs I didn't want to cut it up into subsections, also, it is in the lead- I combine the reception of the concerts and albums since they're basically the same; and overlink had an exception that you repeat links from the lead. --PresN18:38, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I thought about putting this on hold but the points above were only minor and it would take no effort to address them, so this article meets the GA criteria as it is. It's broad, well written and the references all check out. Well done! JAGUAR18:13, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]