Talk:High-pressure torsion

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted from this draft on 28 September 2024 by reviewer Ldm1954 (talk · contribs). Engineering This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Materials This article is within the scope of WikiProject Materials, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Materials on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaterialsWikipedia:WikiProject MaterialsTemplate:WikiProject MaterialsMaterials articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. ‹See TfM› Physics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Metalworking This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metalworking, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Metalworking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalworkingWikipedia:WikiProject MetalworkingTemplate:WikiProject MetalworkingMetalworking articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Ref 3 has an absurd number of authors. I suggest the list be shortened to A.B et.al. Xxanthippe (talk) 11:50, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On second thoughts I think that Ref #3 should be removed altogether until there is evidence that the journal is one in good standing, that all 30 authors from different institutions have given their consent for their names to be included as authors in the reference and that those persons even exist. Until that is done the article should be declined. Are IPs allowed to create articles? See Research paper mill. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:36, 19 August 2024 (UTC).[reply]

To clarify, it is a genuine journal in good standing. This is one of those "let's get together and do a concensus review" papers. Legit. Ldm1954 (talk) 16:42, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: This article cited too few sources. Especially concerning is the fact that it lacks citations for the modern aspects of the topic when such citations are easily found (like http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.03.002). Also, it would be nice if you could add images depicting how this process works. Pygos (talk) 05:02, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. This article has been resubmitted on 15 September 2024. I think it should be declined again as the sources are inadequate. Ref 4 looks as if it has been generated by a research paper mill. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:03, 16 September 2024 (UTC).[reply]
• Comment: I agree with the comments that this article should be improved with an image or two, more material and more citations. However, the approach is highly cited and continues to be so. There is therefore no question of notability. I am going to accept it, but then tag it as needing expansion. Ldm1954 (talk) 14:50, 28 September 2024 (UTC)