Talk:History of the Swiss Air Force

	History of the Swiss Air Force was one of the Warfare good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result September 26, 2009 Good article nominee Listed December 25, 2023 Good article reassessment Delisted
Current status: Delisted good article

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Military history: Aviation / World War II This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force World War II task force Switzerland Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:History of the Swiss Air Force/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review (see here for criteria)

This is a nice piece of work! It could use a box with the insignia of the Air Force, etc. This will not hold up its review any longer, but I'd appreciate your adding it at your convenience.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   I realize these are your own pictures. Some museums prohibit the publication of their exhibits.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   really nice job! It you're going to take it further, you'll need to get the A review at Military History, and they will help with the rest of the Manual of Style issues, and the box. Nice nice job. Auntieruth55 (talk) 23:10, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]