Japanese destroyer Natsuzuki has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 7, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Nominator: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 18:14, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: CosXZ (talk · contribs) 19:30, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
yes Cos (X + Z) 19:30, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
The only image is in public domain and is relevant Cos (X + Z) 23:02, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Earwig show a 2.9% so there is no copyvio Cos (X + Z) 23:10, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
@Sturmvogel 66: I have some things I want you to do under this section. Cos (X + Z) 00:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Mid-year the destroyer was turned over to Great Britain and was scrapped in early 1948.add a comma after "Mid-year".
One of the second batch of Akizuki-class destroyers authorized in the 1941 Rapid Naval Armaments Program,add "Being" to the start of the sentence and replace "batch" with "batches".
Cos (X + Z) 00:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Cos (X + Z) 00:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Cos (X + Z) 00:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Cos (X + Z) 00:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
yes Cos (X + Z) 00:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
yes Cos (X + Z) 00:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. See if my corrections are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 09:59, 7 August 2024 (UTC)