John Holder (umpire) is currently a Sports good article nominee. Nominated by StickyWicket aka AA (talk) at 20:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC) An editor has placed this article on hold to allow improvements to be made to satisfy the good article criteria. Recommendations have been left on the review page, and editors have seven days to address these issues. Improvements made in this period will influence the reviewer's decision whether or not to list the article as a good article. Short description: English cricketer and Test umpire |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: StickeyWicket (talk · contribs) 20:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 11:15, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.
If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)
I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.
Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs)
Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.
Lee Vilenski, AA, where does this review stand? As far as I can tell, Lee Vilenski hasn't returned to it since their most recent post over three months ago. There's a GAN backlog drive starting tomorrow that's concentrating on nominations by editors who are relatively new to GA, so they're out of the queue by 31 October. As far as I can tell, this is AA's first and only GAN submission, so they would qualify. It seems a shame to let this linger if it's possible to get it prompt reviewer attention. My thought is that if Lee Vilenski doesn't take action by Sunday, I will see whether we can get another reviewer from the drive to take over. Please let me know what you think. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:36, 30 September 2024 (UTC)