 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
This article is written to push a particular agenda. The basis for this agenda is a controversial subject (photographic print longevity testing) that is unlikely to be resolved anytime soon.
I suggest that there's no place for this article on Wikipedia specifically for the following reasons:
- Article is simply a rebuttal of criticism of the product by a third party.
- Article uses brand company advertising as citations
- Article is out of date on several key issues (eg regarding other companies products and testing procedures)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabricator4 (talk • contribs)