 | The contents of the Magic hyperbeam page were merged into Magic hypercube#Magic hyperbeam on 31 July 2021. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
To the powers that are:
Constructing this page might take a couple of weeks. As well as figuring out references. Things here might look like offending NOR-principles but be assured I have no intention nor inclination to display new things here. Notation used is well defined though not regularly used. Aale de Winkel 08:36, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
I lifted the Under construction tag, since the article is more or less complete. A google on "magic rectangle" gives too many a reference to select a few decent ones on short notice. The reader is invited to do so in the appropriate section Aale de Winkel 08:04, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
What cleanup!! I try to maintain highest standard, without resorting to "OR". Aale de Winkel 11:19, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Hi there. In response to your request for help, there is a style guideline that you should follow. Also look over WP:RS and WP:V regarding citing sources. Currently the article needs some work on layout, prose and referencing. LaraLove 11:53, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Excuse me, this ain't a piece of literature, but a high quality introduction into the field for the mathematically inclined, as a relief for the boring articles that tell the interested mathematically inclined reader absolutely nothing. I perhaps could use the "math" tag more, however the default suffices and the formulae are neatly boxed. Dispite the fact that my two contributions are internally contained and selfexplainatory I pasted in a few magic rectangle references, to please the wikipedia principles. The two articles do not contain "original research", merely introduce a few tools of the trade.