Talk:New York State Route 32B

	New York State Route 32B has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
	New York State Route 32B is part of the State highways in Warren County, New York series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones Date Process Result July 3, 2008 Good article nominee Listed July 22, 2008 Featured topic candidate Not promoted August 10, 2008 Featured topic candidate Promoted
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

U.S. Roads: State highways / New York Low‑importance This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Topics  U.S. state highways   Locations  New York   This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it. This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists. This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This review is transcluded from Talk:New York State Route 32B/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   ".2 mi (0.32 km)" looks like a rounding error.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Is there at least a rough estimate of how long the initial length of the highway is? If it used to be fairly long (> 50 miles or so) the map is misleading me into thinking this was a tiny road.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   An image of the current route is preferred, but in this case not necessary due to the short length of the road.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Few questions, but otherwise good. —Rob (talk) 03:59, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All things clarified and/or fixed. Thanks!Mitch32^(UP) 10:24, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Passing, but a couple of suggestions - the article could use an image, and a real map. If you have one of U.S. 4 in New York, crop it to the portion between Northumberland and Hudson Falls and use that instead - it's better than the misleading(ish) map. I'd probably drop the existing map altogether - I don't even know where in New York that is! :-) —Rob (talk) 04:00, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]