This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Aaaand that turned out to be false. Whoops. Anyways, here's the review now. Not doing a checklist because probably not necessary for an article as short as this.
Change "Its late 1996 release, near the end of the Game Gear's lifespan, makes the game harder to find than earlier releases, a rare collector's item that commands high prices on the secondary collectible market." to something on the lines of "Its late 1996 release, near the end of the Game Gear's lifespan, makes the game harder to find than earlier releases. It is considered a rare collector's item that commands high prices on the secondary collectible market." for better reading.
The Reception section could be considered repetition of "X said Y", but I think for a subject as obscure as this with the limited sources available, it's written well enough and shouldn't have to be changed.
For sourcing, I am assuming good faith here since I can't speak Spanish or Japanese.
Article I believe covers all coverage necessary for a subject such as this. It presents all coverage in an unbiased manner as well.
Add a caption to the cover art and alternate text to the gameplay screenshot.
Yeah, I don't see many problems with this article that should stop it from becoming a GA besides the few minor things I pointed out. I'll put this on hold until the issues I pointed out are addressed, but they're fairly minor. NegativeMP123:20, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That was quick, and no. Everything I pointed out was all that I noticed could hold it back from GA. I think this meets the point of passing, good job. NegativeMP123:49, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.