A fact from Parsurameswara Temple appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 August 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Generally excellent article. It is neutral, stable, and fairly comprehensive. Images are appropriately licenced. I have copyedited it where i was clear about the intended meaning. Other points:
At one point we have "the sanctum, called vimana," and at another "The sanctum (garbhagriha)". It can't be both - something needs fixing.
I have removed garbhagriha to make it consistent.
"the walls are mottled by portions" - what?? Neither the use of "mottled" nor "portions" makes sense here. Can someone check this out?
rephrased
Final section has "...prove the existence of Natyasastra tradition during the times." There need to be at least a few words explaining what this tradition is - a wikilink is not sufficient. Also specify during which times.
Good point - I had a wrong denotion here - it was Devadasi tradition, whose existence is insisted. I have rephrased the section.