Talk:Parsurameswara Temple

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Parsurameswar Temple/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hamiltonstone (talk · contribs) 13:01, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Generally excellent article. It is neutral, stable, and fairly comprehensive. Images are appropriately licenced. I have copyedited it where i was clear about the intended meaning. Other points:

  • At one point we have "the sanctum, called vimana," and at another "The sanctum (garbhagriha)". It can't be both - something needs fixing.
I have removed garbhagriha to make it consistent.
  • "the walls are mottled by portions" - what?? Neither the use of "mottled" nor "portions" makes sense here. Can someone check this out?
rephrased
  • Final section has "...prove the existence of Natyasastra tradition during the times." There need to be at least a few words explaining what this tradition is - a wikilink is not sufficient. Also specify during which times.
Good point - I had a wrong denotion here - it was Devadasi tradition, whose existence is insisted. I have rephrased the section.

I think that's it. hamiltonstone (talk) 13:01, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for taking up the review. Let me fix the items quoted.Ssriram mt (talk) 16:09, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please let me know for further comments.Ssriram mt (talk) 17:35, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think that's it. Thank you for the prompt responses. hamiltonstone (talk) 01:13, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]