| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Phillip Schofield affair controversy redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
 | This redirect is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | Before requesting any edits to this protected article, please familiarise yourself with reliable sourcing requirements. Before posting an edit request on this talk page, please read the reliable sourcing and original research policies. These policies require that information in Wikipedia articles be supported by citations from reliable independent sources, and disallow your personal views, observations, interpretations, analyses, or anecdotes from being used. Only content verified by subject experts and other reliable sources may be included, and uncited material may be removed without notice. If your complaint is about an assertion made in the article, check first to see if your proposed change is supported by reliable sources. If it is not, it is highly unlikely that your request will be granted. Checking the archives for previous discussions may provide more information. Requests which do not provide citations from reliable sources, or rely on unreliable sources, may be subject to closure without any other response. |
 | The name of the runner the subject had an affair with is widely disseminated across the Internet, but there is currently no reliable source that has named him (WP:NOTRIGHT and WP:RELIABILITY). Furthermore, Wikipedia's policies and guidelines are clear on not naming the runner, see: WP:LOWPROFILE, WP:BLP1E, WP:LPNAME, WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE, and most importantly WP:AVOIDVICTIM. Editors may still debate it on this talk page. |
 | For the time being, when discussing the inclusion of the runners name, do not include his name, or reference any unreliable sources that name him (see WP:RSPSOURCES). |