Talk:Portuguese profanity

This article was nominated for deletion on 27/2/2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: keep, 27 December 2015, see discussion. no consensus, 10 September 2008 (UTC), see discussion.

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 April 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 February 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Linguistics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Languages This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article should not exist. Why is it relevant to have profanity explained to people in an encyclopedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.136.152.161 (talk) 10:24, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: Because it's an important part of social life - especially important in Brazil, where it's very normal to hear people cursing and swearing. If there's a need for people to know about it, it is worth having it in an encyclopedia (though it could be a lot more organized). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.47.221.241 (talk) 09:25, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]