This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
[dubious – discuss] This article has an inherent contradiction regarding when a red bananas are ripe. The top section says "When ripe, raw red bananas have a flesh that is cream to light pink in color" while the Description section says "Red bananas should have a deep red or maroon rind when ripe."
On the List of banana cultivars page, under the heading "AAA Group", "Red Dacca" or Red Banana is listed not indented with the Cavendish Subgroup, listed instead as a separate cultivar. In addition, on the Cavendish banana page, there is no mention anywhere of the red banana being a part of this subgroup. However on this Red banana page, it mentions twice that it is part of the Cavendish group. Is this a misnomer? Unless I am mistaken, shouldn't it be in its own Red subgroup and not in the Cavendish subgroup? Or is it that the Cavendish cultivars are so popular that the AAA group is also synonymously (mistakenly) called the Cavendish group (even though there are several non Cavendish cultivars also in the AAA group)? --64.30.64.130 (talk) 04:17, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]