 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2 June 2017. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
I have no idea if the information presented here is correct, but I must take exception to the style.An encyclopedia article should have a certain timeless element. How will this article read in twenty years time? RBC was in which administration? When was he appointed? When did he say what he said?
This article needs much work. As I am not an expert in the subject, I cannot lend a hand, only complain. [[PaulinSaudi 13:37, 5 Nov 2004 (UTC)]]
- Bobby? Oh please... Sounds like it was written by his secretary.
76.250.61.95 (talk) 00:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
This was clearly written by the subject or a P.R. person. All of the substantive material was provided by two users, Rsw1022 and Hoveros, both accounts solely worked on Robert B. Charles's page and then deleted their accounts.
The writing is entirely self-promoting and about an unimportant person not worthy of a page. There is a clear bias towards celebrating his own work.