Russia in the Eurovision Song Contest 1995 has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria . If you can improve it further, please do so . If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it .Article milestones Date Process Result August 8, 2023 Good article nominee Listed
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eurovision , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Eurovision -related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Eurovision Wikipedia:WikiProject Eurovision Template:WikiProject Eurovision Eurovision articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale .
This review is transcluded from Talk:Russia in the Eurovision Song Contest 1995/GA1 . The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs ) 09:32, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ]
It is reasonably well written .
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar) :
b. (MoS for lead , layout , word choice , fiction , and lists ) :
It is factually accurate and verifiable .
a. (reference section ) :
b. (citations to reliable sources ) :
c. (OR ) :
d. (copyvio and plagiarism ) :
It is broad in its coverage .
a. (major aspects ) :
b. (focused ) :
It follows the neutral point of view policy .
Fair representation without bias :
It is stable .
No edit wars, etc. :
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales ) :
b. (appropriate use with suitable captions ) :
Overall :
Pass/fail :
(Criteria marked are unassessed)
Time to get rid of this old nomination! --K. Peake 09:32, 1 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ]
The songwriters are not directly sourced anywhere in the body as they should be
Wikilink Philipp Kirkovov in the lead
"to select Russian entrant." → "to select the Russian entrant."
To avoid the lead being too cluttered, you should start a new para at Vocal Band
"due to the band members being" → "due to the members being"
Wikilink music video
I think it is worth noting that the placing was their worst result
Everything's done - Danilmay (talk ) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ]
Introduce RTR and ORT by their full names per this being the first mentions in the body
"which will represent Russia" → "which would represent Russia"
Everything's done - Danilmay (talk ) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ]
Evrovidenie "Pesnya-95"[ edit ]
Img looks good!
Pipe previous year's contest to Eurovision Song Contest 1994
"participation in 1994 contest" → "participation in the 1994 contest"
"didn't participate in 1994 contest." → "didn't participate in this contest."
"in 1994 contest," → "in the 1994 contest," but where is this 17 part sourced?
"Philipp Kirkorov took part in" → "Kirkorov took part in"
"on 8 and 10 May," → "on 8 and 10 May 1995,"
"wearing white shirt and" → "wearing a white shirt and"
"was the Russia's worst placing" → "was Russia's worst placing"
"had won the contest;" → "had emerged as winners;"
"the Russian singer."" only keep inside speech marks if this is a full sentence per MOS:QUOTE
Everything's done - Danilmay (talk ) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ]
"for 1995 contest," → "for the Eurovision Song Contest 1995," since this is a new sub section
"to the ten highest-ranking songs" → "to the 10 highest-ranking songs" per MOS:NUM
"assembled 16-member jury panel," → "assembled a 16-member jury panel,"
Pipe Lora Kvint to Квинт, Лора Геннадьевна
Everything's done - Danilmay (talk ) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ]
Table looks good!
Copyvio score looks phenomenal at 4.8%!!!!
Why is EBU only in brackets on ref 1?
Removed - Danilmay (talk ) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ]
Fix MOS:QWQ issues with refs 2 and 18
Can you explain in more detail what needs to be done, because I tried to fix it, but it got worse and messy. Danilmay (talk ) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ]
Ref 4 is government owned, so are you sure about the reliability?
Removed - Danilmay (talk ) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ]
Fix MOS:QWQ issues with ref 7 and what exactly makes this source reliable?
Removed - Danilmay (talk ) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ]
What is ref 8 and why is it reliable?
Removed - Danilmay (talk ) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ]
Pipe Raidió Teilifís Éireann to RTÉ
Done - Danilmay (talk ) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ]
Is ref 20 WP:USERG ?
I don't think so. I looked through this site and found no evidence that this site is self-published. - Danilmay (talk ) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ]
K. Peake , I've made almost all the changes you've requested. Only I had one question (added above). Danilmay (talk ) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ]
Danilmay MOS:QWQ issues are when you have used double speech marks inside reference titles; replace with singular ones ('). --K. Peake 15:17, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ]
K. Peake : Done - Danilmay (talk ) 17:55, 8 August 2023 (UTC) [ reply ]